John Freund's Posts

2856 Articles

UK Post Office Hit With Bill for Legal Costs in Therium-Funded Horizon Claim

By John Freund |
Freeths, the law firm representing the pool of over 500 sub-postmasters who are suing the UK Post Office for wrongful termination and damages due to unfair business practices, has filed a bill for millions of pounds in legal fees from the first of four trials in which the Post Office was found to be contractually liable to the sub-postmasters. As reported in Computer Weekly, Judge Fraser ruled in the first trial that the Post Office implemented a “culture of secrecy” around its Horizon accounting system. Sub-postmasters – or managers of individual branches – blame the system for errors which showed losses when there weren’t any. The sub-postmasters were held responsible for any unexplained revenue shortfalls, and many were fired, driven into bankruptcy, and some even went to prison (one while pregnant). Therium Capital Management is now funding a claimant pool of over 500 sub-postmasters who are seeking recompense for their alleged mistreatment. The first trial was a resounding win for the sub-postmasters, which saw Judge Fraser declare a culture of “oppressive behavior” at the Post Office. Management demanded repayment of funds that were never missing in the first place. Instead, the Horizon accounting system was to blame. The second trial is currently underway. The Post Office has filed a motion for the judge to recuse himself due to a conflict of interest. The hearing for that motion is set to begin on April 3.

Montani semper liberi — “Mountaineers are Always Free”

By John Freund |
This article was contributed by Eric Schuller, President of the Alliance for Responsible Consumer Legal Funding.  Montani semper liberi; "Mountaineers are Always Free" is the motto of the State of West Virginia, but apparently the motto only applies to a select group of Mountaineers. The Legislature of West Virginia passed – and the Governor signed into law – Senate Bill 360 which sets out to regulate Consumer Legal Funding in the state. Unfortunately, SB 360 is a set of meaningless regulations, given that the legislation implements rate restrictions on the Consumer Legal Funding Industry which restrict the product from even being offered to the citizens of the state. So in essence, SB 360 bans the product altogether. A similar rate was introduced and enacted in Arkansas in 2017, and the product has not been offered there since. What is interesting is that Arkansas and West Virginia are among the top 10 poorest states in the country, meaning their citizens are consumers who can least afford to lose a significant source of financial support that would otherwise be available to them. Then again, perhaps that’s the Insurance industry’s reason for targeting these states in the first place. Consumer Legal Funding is a lifeline for people who have a pending legal claim, such as a car accident. It allows them to put food on the table while their case is making its way through the legal system. Like Alice from West Union, WV who stated, “I am unable to work and having a really hard time providing for my kids, and this is a major help.” Or Mary from Follansbee, WV who said “It helped prevent shut off notices, and paid my rent”. Unfortunately, consumers like Mary and Alice will no longer have the ability to help make ends meet thanks to the enactment of SB 360. This legislation was driven by the Insurance industry and the US Chamber of Commerce, with the sole purpose of eliminating access to this vital financial resource. The industry tried to work with the legislature in reaching a compromise that would allow for proper regulation and oversight, yet still permit the industry to operate. But at every turn, the US Chamber of Commerce, the Insurance Industry and their lobbyists swooped in and leveraged their might against consumers in order to prevent this product from being offered. Montani semper liberi – "Mountaineers are Always Free" – that motto is supposed to apply to all citizens of West Virginia. Unfortunately, those with enough clout and influence can relinquish the freedom of citizens to access a financial product which allows them to make ends meet, while the multibillion-dollar insurance industry increases profits and squeezes out the very consumers that SB 360 is ostensibly trying to help. Eric Schuller President Alliance for Responsible Consumer Legal Funding
Read More

International Arbitral Tribunals Are Making a Push for More Female Arbitrators

By John Freund |
It's Women's History Month, so there's no better time to evaluate the state of equal representation for women (or lack thereof) when it comes to international arbitration. Despite much discussion about 'equal opportunity', arbitral tribunals are still dominated by men. Perhaps that's why in 2015, members of the arbitration community formed The Equal Representation in Arbitration Pledge, which seeks to achieve full parity between women and men on arbitral tribunals across the world. As reported in Vannin Capital's special Women in Focus series, the Pledge was created by Jackie van Haersolte-van Hof, Director General at the London Court of International Arbitration, and Sylvia Noury, London Head of International Arbitration at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. van Haersolte-van Hof was in attendance at an ICC event in Miami when she first formulated the notion of a 'pledge' to increase diversity on arbitral tribunals. She claims inspiration came from large corporations in the US who began to demand greater diversity of the law firms they engaged with. She admits that her initial idea was centered around a goal of broader diversity, but that in order to make that bold leap a first step was needed; and that first step was in the direction of gender diversity. It was Noury who eventually took her idea and ran with it. Throughout 2015, she arranged a series of dinners where the Pledge was formalized and eventually finalized. In May of 2016 it was ultimately launched, and included 300 signatories. That number has ballooned to 3,000 now, as the Pledge has evolved from a back-of-the-napkin response to gender uniformity into a full-scale global movement for gender diversity. A longstanding challenge of diversity has been a lack of senior leadership from women in the legal field. This is primarily due to the fact that women have not been full participants for very long, hence they could not 'climb the ladder' in the same way their male counterparts could. However, that trend is slowly shifting. These days there is a greater influx of women into Legal Services, and both van Haersolte-van Hof and Noury are optimistic that the influx will translate into higher rates of women in senior leadership positions over time. When looking at the arbitral institutions who singed the Pledge, the average number of female arbitrators appointed in 2017 was 20%, that's up from 10% just three years prior. Some specific institutions - like the SCC - are up to 40% appointed females. in addition to fostering a culture of inclusivity, gender diversity has the added benefit of positively-impacting qualitative decision-making. Diverse perspectives have been proven to enhance strategic planning and management. As Noury puts it: "They say that three heads are better than one, but if all are thinking in the same way then that benefit is lost. Diversity brings a different perspective, which is important to avoid “group think” and keep everyone honest. This matters as much in arbitration as it does in the real world." With the push for gender inclusivity in international arbitration, the global Legal Services community is making a bold statement. van Haersolte-van Hof and Noury are leading the way with the Pledge, which may yet prove to be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the broader goal of diversity across the board.

Legal-Bay Pre Settlement Funding Announces Increased Focus on IVC Filter Cases

By John Freund |
JERSEY CITY, N.J.March 26, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Legal-Bay LLC, The Pre Settlement Funding Company, announced today that they will be expanding their funding for IVC lawsuits, effectively immediately. IVC filters are devices which inhibit blood clots in patients, preventing pulmonary embolisms. 80% of the filters sold are put out by C.R. Bard (Eclipse brand Vena Cava filterand Cook (Celect brand IVC filter)The two companies have come under fire recently for the devices' defective manufacturing including perforations, shifting after implantation, filter fractures, and general ineffectiveness. Legal-Bay is a leading personal injury pre-settlement advocate, and works directly with most of the top mass tort law firms to provide the best pre-settlement cash advance rates in the industry in as little as 24 – 48 hours.  Legal-Bay believes that the IVC Litigation is turning in favor of a potential settlement by year-end in which many plaintiffs will have a better estimate of their IVC lawsuit value and possible settlement amounts. Chris Janish, CEO of Legal-Bay commented, "Our close monitoring of the IVC Litigation has indicated  that a settlement range could be announced in 2019. However, nothing is certain at this time as the defendants are still contesting liability. If a settlement is reached, plaintiffs should understand it could take a long time to receive payouts. In light of this, and due to the increased need we are seeing from our clients, we are now putting an extra focus on providing pre settlement funding to IVC filter plaintiffs." If you are involved in a pending IVC lawsuit and are looking for a pre-settlement cash advance now before your case settles, you can fill out an application form at the company's website: http://lawsuitssettlementfunding.com If you do not have an attorney, feel free to contact Legal-Bay and they can assist you with retaining a top IVC lawyer or IVC law firm that works with clients that need funding. All of Legal-Bay funding programs are risk-free as you only repay the advance if your case is successful. The non-recourse advance is not a lawsuit loan, settlement loan, or pre-settlement loans. Please apply online at:  http://lawsuitssettlementfunding.com or call the company's toll free hotline at: 877.571.0405 where agents are standing by. Source:  Legal-Bay LLC
Read More

Common Fund Orders Have Been Approved by Australian Courts: Now Fair Payouts Are the Focus

By John Freund |
The Full Federal Court of Australia and the New South Wales Court of Appeal have found in separate judgments that common fund orders can be approved by courts in class action cases. This is good news for litigation funders and the large pools of claimants they represent. However, the focus of courts will now be on ensuring a fair and reasonable payout to funders, which means the fees they command are under increased scrutiny. As reported in Mondaq, courts in Australia and new South Wales agreed to a joint hearing on the common fund order issue, in what has come to be known as a "super" appeal. The courts jointly heard a trio of cases, and concluded in separate decisions that trial courts do indeed have the authority to issue a common fund order in a class action case. Common fund orders mandate that all claimants contribute to the litigation funder's fee, regardless of whether they signed the funding agreement. In essence, if the funder finances the claim, all group members are responsible for the funder's fee. With the applicability of common fund order confirmed (pending an appeal), the focus now shifts to 'fair and reasonable' payouts. Australian courts, wary of the impact litigation funding is having on the class action environment, want to be certain that funders aren't gouging their clients. As a result, many are predicting that courts will apply extra scrutiny to the fees incurred by litigation funders, in an effort to ensure fairness.

Does the Common Interest Doctrine Protect Third Party Funders from Accessing Privileged Information?

By John Freund |
When it comes to the issue of disclosure of third party funders and their funding agreements, courts across the United States have consistently held that such information is protected under work product (some legislators have yet to catch on). That said, when it comes to the issue of sharing privileged information with a litigation funder, courts aren't as uniform in their findings. Some hold that the common interest doctrine protects privileged information that is passed on to a funder, and others have ruled the exact opposite. According to National Law Review, courts have been decidedly split on the issue of sharing privileged information with a third party funder - whether that be a prospective funder, or even one that is already contracted. In California, the district court in  Odyssey Wireless, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188611 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 19, 2016) found that privileged documents disclosed to a funder do not wave work product, given the common interest that exists between third party funders and the plaintiffs (or in some cases defendants) they finance. However, in Berger v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88811 at *7-*8 (N.D. Cal. 2008), a separate district court found that the common interest doctrine does not apply to litigation funders, given that it was originally created to protect multiple litigants represented by a single counsel. Even though the doctrine is applied more broadly today, the court found that funders should not be covered under the umbrella of 'common interest.' Delaware has a similar discrepancy. In Carlyle Investment Mgmt. L.L.C. v. Moonmouth Co. S.A., No. 7841-VCP, 2015 Del. Ch. LEXIS 42 at *28-*30 (Del. Ch. Feb. 24, 2015), the state court found that common interest applies. However, in Leader Techs. Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., 729 F.Supp. 2d 373 (D. Del. 2010), the federal court disagreed, despite the fact that a written common interest agreement was in place between litigator and funder. All of this is quite head-scratching. But such is the nature of a common law jurisdiction when a relatively new enterprise emerges across the legal landscape. Unfortunately for funders, lawyers and claimants, the only thing we can be certain of going forward is that nothing is for certain. Case law remains unsettled, and the inconsistency on this issue arising from courtrooms across America will likely continue.

Woodsford Litigation Funding opens office in Tel Aviv

By John Freund |
LONDON and TEL AVIV – Monday 25th March 2019, Woodsford Litigation Funding, the global provider of litigation financing solutions for businesses, individuals and law firms, has announced the opening of an office on Rothschild Boulevard in central Tel-Aviv. Woodsford has also announced the appointment of Yoav Navon as Director of Litigation Finance, Israel. Yoav was previously engaged by Woodsford as a Consultant. The office opening and the elevation of Yoav Navon, who has represented Woodsford in Tel Aviv for almost a year, illustrates Woodsford’s long term view of the potential for the Israeli market. Yoav Navon commented, “Having represented Woodsford in Israel for the past 10 months, I am now glad to have cemented my position at one of the leading global funders.  I can see the appetite for and understanding of the benefits funding offers is growing rapidly here.  We are already funding a number of Israeli parties in high stakes litigation, and we see real potential for growth, particularly in intellectual property litigation and international arbitration but in other areas too. ” “We are a growing, increasingly global business with a presence on both coasts of the US, the UK, Singapore and Australia. We engaged with Yoav last year as we believed there were a number of factors that made Israel another attractive and potentially lucrative market for us. With the opportunities we are now seeing in Israel, appointing Yoav to a permanent position and opening an office in Tel Aviv are the obvious next steps. Woodsford is looking to invest around $200m in 2019/20 in meritorious claims of all types, and we anticipate around 10% of that will be invested in Israeli claimants.” said Steven Friel, Woodsford’s CEO. About Woodsford Litigation Funding Founded in 2010 and with offices in London, Philadelphia Singapore and Tel Aviv, Woodsford Litigation Funding provides tailored litigation financing solutions for businesses, individuals, and law firms. This includes both single case and portfolio litigation funding, group action funding and arbitration funding. Woodsford’s Executive team blends extensive business experience with world-class legal expertise. Woodsford is a founder member of the Association of Litigation Funders of England and Wales. For further information visit http://www.woodsfordlitigationfunding.com or follow on Twitter @WoodsfordLF.
Read More

Litigation Capital Management (AIM:LIT) announces global cooperation agreement with leading law firm

By John Freund |

Litigation Capital Management Limited (AIM:LIT) (LCM), a leading international provider of litigation financing solutions, announces that it has entered into a global cooperation agreement with a leading international law firm.

The global cooperation agreement puts LCM in prime position to finance disputes undertaken by the law firm and its clients. LCM has agreed to make available access to significant funding for disputes as they arise for the law firm and its clients, regardless of geography or jurisdiction; that meet the Company’s rigorous due diligence process.

The law firm, which is headquartered in London, operates across six continents through a network of 50 offices and over 400 partners. The law firm is one of the most active in the litigation space globally and works with clients across sectors including aviation, energy and natural resources, infrastructure, trade and commodities, and insurance.

Patrick Moloney, Chief Executive Officer of LCM, said:

“We’re delighted to have agreed this global cooperation agreement with one of the leading law firms worldwide and one of the most active in the litigation space. The partners at the firm will have access to funding that LCM is providing, regardless of jurisdiction or geography.

“Our on-the-ground presence through offices in London, Sydney and Singapore allows us to support the law firm and its clients. This agreement will increase the number of potential funding opportunities available to LCM, in addition to our already substantial pipeline of investment opportunities, which we continually evaluate in line with our rigorous due-diligence procedures.”

About LCM Litigation Capital Management (“LCM”) is a leading international provider of litigation financing solutions. This includes single-case and portfolio across class actions, commercial claims, claims arising out of insolvency and international arbitration. LCM has an unparalleled track record, driven by effective project selection, active project management and robust risk management. Headquartered in Sydney, with offices in London, Singapore, Brisbane and Melbourne, LCM has been listed on AIM since December 2018, trading under the ticker LIT.
Read More

Therium Exceeds $1 Billion Milestone In Latest Fundraise From Global Institutional Investors

By John Freund |

Jersey, Channel Islands, 25 March, 2019. Therium Group Holdings Limited, a leading global provider of litigation, arbitration and specialty legal finance, today announced that it has exceeded an important $1billion milestone of funds raised, following a latest fund raise of £325 million from three global institutional investors, including a sovereign wealth fund, to finance litigation and arbitration globally. It is Therium’s largest fund and follows the £200 million raised in February 2018.

John Byrne, Co-Founder and CEO of Therium Capital Management Limited, said: “We are thrilled to announce the closing of our latest fund, Therium’s largest to date. Raising over $1 billion is an important milestone for the industry and underscores Therium’s leading position in the litigation finance industry globally. Interest from high quality institutional investors was stronger than ever, driven by the rapid growth of the firm, the very strong outlook for our business globally and our track record. We are delighted to have the backing of world leading institutional investors in our new fund and we are very excited about the ongoing high growth opportunity ahead for Therium, which is now in its 11th year.”

Neil Purslow, Co-Founder and Chief Investment Officer of Therium Capital Management Limited, said: “The demand for our litigation and arbitration funding continues at pace across all of our jurisdictions. The benefits of funding are becoming increasingly widespread across the world; from claimants that would not otherwise have the capital to launch their claims, to the largest corporates that use funding to transform claims into financial assets. In line with this, we are seeing a steady rise of single case funding as well as litigation and arbitration financing across multiple dispute types.”

Therium recently announced the opening of an office in Australia, to serve Asia-Pacific, where the firm has been funding cases since 2011. The firm also has investment teams in the UK, USA, Germany, Spain and Norway. Therium was the first commercial litigation funder to have operations on the ground in Germany and Scandinavia and it was the first European firm to launch a full service business in the US.

Therium will use the new funds to continue to invest in litigation and arbitration cases globally across sectors including financial services, energy and mining, industrials, technology, media and entertainment, and across all forms of commercial litigation and arbitration. Therium invests in a broad range of complex commercial disputes, from securities and shareholder actions, international arbitration, competition and anti-trust cases, through to intellectual property, insolvency and group and class actions. Furthermore, demand for Therium’s specialty legal finance solutions from corporates and law firms continues apace across jurisdictions. The new fund is expected to be deployed within two years.

In November 2018, Therium won the ‘Insolvency Litigation Funder of the Year’ award at the Turnaround Restructuring and Insolvency awards in London in recognition of its cross border insolvency funding expertise and leading track record.

In Chambers and Partners’ inaugural litigation support directory 2018, Therium was ranked as a Tier 1 litigation funder, and Neil Purslow was named a leading individual in the litigation funding industry. Therium is a founder member of the Association of Litigation Funders of England and Wales.

Last month, Therium Capital Management was top ranked as one of the two “Leading” litigation and arbitration funding firms in the UK by legal and business directory Leaders League, in their 2019 ranking of litigation funding. Therium was also ranked as “Excellent” in the 2019 US ranking

Case highlights, which are in the public domain, include:

  • Sharp and others v Lloyds Banking Group (re Lloyds’s acquisition of HBOS)
  • Noel Edmonds v Lloyds Banking Group
  • Consumers v VW re Dieselgate
  • Road Haulage Association v Truck manufacturers
  • Richard Lloyd v Google Inc (re data protection)
  • UK retailers v Mastercard and Visa (re interchange fees)
  • PCP Capital Partners v Barclays Bank plc
  • Bates & Ors v Post Office Ltd
  • Atlant Entreprenor v City of Oslo
  • Webb v GetSwift Ltd
  • Shareholders v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd

About Therium

Therium is a leading global provider of litigation, arbitration and specialty legal finance active in England and Wales and internationally since 2009.  Over that period, Therium has funded claims with a total value exceeding £34 billion including many of the largest and most high profile funded cases.  The firm has investment teams in the UK, USA, Australia, Spain, Germany and Oslo, supplementing its resources in its corporate headquarters in Jersey, Channel Islands.

Therium has established a track record of success in litigation finance in all forms including single case litigation and arbitration funding, funding law firms and funding portfolios of litigation and arbitration claims.  This track record enabled the firm to raise the then single largest investment into litigation finance of £200 million in 2015.  The latest raise builds upon the previous raise of £200m which closed in only February 2018.

Therium has raised over $1 billion since its foundation, which includes the latest £325 million fund raised in March 2019.

Therium has consistently been at the forefront of innovation in litigation finance, pioneering the combined use of insurance tools alongside funding vehicles, and introducing portfolio funding products into the UK.  The firm’s ability to develop innovative funding arrangements and bespoke financial solutions for litigants and law firms complements its unmatched experience and rigorous approach to funding a wide range of commercial disputes throughout the world.

www.therium.com

Read More

Balanced Bridge Reaffirms Their Commitment to Focus Exclusively on Post-Settlement Funding

By John Freund |
ARDMORE, Pa.March 22, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Specialty finance firm Balanced Bridge Funding ("Balanced Bridge"), which offers to accelerate fees, awards, salaries, claims, contract earnings, and other future receivables across numerous asset classes, has made a commitment to focus the legal funding portion of their business exclusively on post-settlement funding. Virtually all legal finance companies concentrate their efforts on either pre-settlement advances or commercial litigation funding. "This is logical, as the vast majority of demand in the legal finance space exists within these categories," says Joseph Genovesi, CEO of Balanced Bridge. "However, there is still a demand for post-settlement advances, mainly for plaintiffs' attorneys, but also their clientele in certain scenarios where there is an extensive post-settlement payout delay. It is our goal to dominate this niche by providing affordable rates, transparent terms, and lightning fast turnaround." While it is true that some legal funding companies offer post-settlement advances to their clients in addition to their primary financial services, they are often unable to provide the full amount of capital required by the attorney or plaintiff requesting an advance. Because Balanced Bridge only focuses on settled case funding, they are uniquely equipped to offer the maximum advance amount as quickly as possible due to their streamlined underwriting process and large capital pool dedicated exclusively to financing post-settlement deals. "Balanced Bridge was created to provide financing to professionals with special funding requests not serviced by traditional lenders," says Patrick Conlin, Managing Director of Balanced Bridge. "We can provide fast financial relief to attorneys working on a contingency fee basis as well as their clientele by accelerating a portion of their delayed post-settlement receivables." Balanced Bridge purchases a portion of its clients' future receivables. In turn, they advance funds against the purchased amount, allowing the client to quickly access their money instead of becoming indebted to a lender. The result is a novel, fast, and affordable cash flow solution. The principals of Balanced Bridge, Joseph Genovesi and Patrick Conlin, have over 30 years of combined experience in the alternative finance space. Mr. Genovesi was the head of an alternative finance company. Prior to that, he served as president of a $200 million legal funding company and was the senior vice president at an alternative advisory firm. Mr. Conlin was an advisor to growth companies across multiple industries advising on matters related to mergers and acquisitions and raising capital. Are you a plaintiffs' attorney or plaintiff with a slow-paying settled case? Balanced Bridge is uniquely equipped to provide you the maximum advance amount possible with fair rates and transparent terms. To learn more about Balanced Bridge and its post-settlement funding solutions, please call 267-457-4540 to speak with one of their settlement funding specialists. You can also visit them on the web at https://www.balancedbridge.com, where you can submit an application for funding. Media Contact: 
Joseph Genovesi 
jgenovesi@balancedbridge.com 
267-457-4540 SOURCE Balanced Bridge Funding

Related Links

https://www.balancedbridge.com
Read More

Burford Reaches FTSE-100 Status With Extraordinary Growth

By John Freund |
After a recent 10% rise in share price, Burford Capital, the world's largest litigation funder, clocked in at a $4 billion valuation. That's enough to rank the company at the bottom of the FTSE-100, and many investors - including veteran fund manager Neil Woodford - feel that Burford is bound to rise even higher. According to City A.M., Burford announced that it has committed $2.6 billion to new investments over the past two years, double all of its cumulative prior commitments. The litigation funder also raised a massive $1.6 billion new fund, with most of that money coming from an unnamed sovereign wealth group. That capital will be deployed over the coming four years, according to the company. Last year, Burford maintained an operating margin of 84%, which helped the company achieve net profit growth of 24%, to $328 million. The company's return on equity was an impressive 30%. There is now some chatter about Burford de-listing from the AIM and perhaps moving to the LSE, where the stock will achieve even greater visibility. Time will tell if the funder decides to make that switch.

Litigation funding to double in five years as asset class becomes mainstream: expert

By John Freund |
Litigation funding is undeniably becoming a mainstream asset class with the market set to double in the next five years. This is the prediction from Dilip N Massand of Legal Ventures, a UAE based fund by Phoenix Advisors that specializes in emerging markets. It is backed by Dalma Capital, a leading alternative investment manager.
Litigation funding takes place when a third party, with no direct interest in the proceedings, finances the cost of litigation in return for a share of the claim proceeds if the litigation is successful.
Mr Massand, who has over two decades of experience working on cross-border matters involving India, the Middle East, and the US, comments: “Depending on the jurisdiction, litigation funding is either about to become - or already is - a mainstream asset class.
“What is clear is the direction of travel: litigation finance is now undeniably emerging as a mainstream asset in its own right on a global level.” He continues: “In Australia, for example, the market is already heavily developed, but even the Australian market is expected to grow, owing to rising litigation demand for class actions. "The U.S., which currently accounts for around 40 per cent of all litigation funding, also remains a significant growth market primarily due to it being the largest litigation market. At 5 per cent, the UK is a considerably smaller but a highly attractive region for litigation funders being home to over 200 law firms and four of the top 10 global law firms. “Elsewhere, litigation funding for arbitration cases has been recently authorised in Singapore and Hong Kong. Whilst the Middle East, being a central hub for global trade, regularly sees substantial high-value disputes involving sophisticated entities and multiple jurisdictions. Most recently, significant discussion is taking place in India about the role litigation funding can play in making the resolution of domestic cases more efficient and providing access to justice for those who otherwise might not be able to afford it.” Besides the growing global reach of the sector, there are, says Mr. Massand, other major ‘pull factors’ for investors. “Clearly, the market itself has enormous potential for growth on a global scale, as ongoing and increasing regulatory reforms open the litigation funding market in many more regions. But there are other attractive elements compelling investors to invest in litigation funding. “These include uncorrelation to traditional capital markets, allowing for greater portfolio diversification – which is universally recognised as the investors’ best weapon to mitigate risk. In addition, there are outsized historical returns, and a reduced time to liquidity.” Indeed, a study by Professor Michael McDonald in 2016 on the litigation funding industry ROI indicated an average annual return of 36 per cent. “Given the market is expanding due to regulatory reforms in more global jurisdictions, the fact that there will always be legal claims, and that it represents an attractive alternative for investors, I am confident the litigation funding sector will double within the next five years. It will continue to extend itself into new jurisdictions in the emerging markets surrounding us in the UAE.” “As we enter the late stages of economic and credit cycles globally, sophisticated investors are increasingly seeking uncorrelated asset classes that can perform well in a market downturn” adds Zachary Cefaratti, CEO of Dalma Capital, “Litigation funding is a unique asset class in this regard; demand for litigation funding increases during downturns in the markets – a time when litigation spikes.” “As was the case in 2008, we expect the performance and opportunities for litigation funds to increase in the event of downturns and increasing market volatility.” About Dalma Capital: Dalma (DIFC) is an alternative investment accelerator and investment advisory firm focused on alternative investments and innovative financial products. The company primarily serves institutions, family offices and corporations - managing their alternative investments and advising on innovative financial products, including Islamic Investment Solutions, with a focus on Alpha generating strategies.
Read More

Litigation Funding & The Invisible Gorilla

By John Freund |
The following post was submitted by Dean Lipson, Partner of Covered Bridge Capital. Ever hear of the psychological experiment known as the Invisible Gorilla?[1]  It goes like this: You’re asked to watch a brief video of a group of people moving randomly about in a pack. Several of these people are wearing white shirts and passing a ball amongst themselves. You’re asked to count the number of passes that occur. During the video, a person dressed as a gorilla enters the middle of the pack and, while facing the camera, thumps his chest for a few seconds then exits. The video ends and you’re asked to give the number of times the ball was passed. Most likely, you get that right. You’re then asked if you saw the gorilla. Huh, what gorilla? Yes, despite being on-screen for 9 seconds, half of all participants in the experiment never see the gorilla. Ever hear of the lawsuit captioned Avery vs. State Farm?[2] It goes like this: 20 years ago, an Illinois jury awarded $456 million to plaintiffs in an action against State Farm for its use of inferior car parts in car repairs; conduct which violated State Farm’s own insurance policies. Following a finding of fraud, an additional $730 million was added to the verdict bringing the total to roughly $1.2 billion. That amount was then reduced to $1.01 billion on appeal. State Farm wasn’t done though. It filed yet another appeal, this time with Illinois’ highest court, which granted State Farm the ultimate victory: The verdict was completely overturned. The events of Avery gave rise to a second suit against State Farm. In Hale vs. State Farm[3], the Avery plaintiffs alleged State Farm had not only orchestrated the recruitment of Lloyd Karmeier but also had secretly bankrolled his successful bid to be become an Illinois Supreme Court Justice in 2004[4]. Why? Because the Avery case was on appeal at that time and Justice Karmeier would now be available to influence its fate, which is precisely what happened.  Hale was filed in 2012 and it alleged the events leading up to, and following, the Karmeier election violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Again, the assertion here was that State Farm had organized and managed Karmeier’s campaign behind the scenes; that State Farm had covertly funneled millions of dollars to support the campaign through intermediary organizations over which State Farm had exerted considerable influence. Hale dragged on for 6 years before settling in 2018 for $250 million. The settlement was approved on the basis that only one of roughly 5 million plaintiffs objected. Well, with the claim now going into its 20th year and with individual net recoveries averaging less than $50, it’s a wonder anyone made the effort to object. It’s unfortunate Hale settled and the public was denied a look behind the curtain. Still, the circumstantial evidence is ample and more than enough to suggest the insurance giant pulled strings and levered its enormous influence to achieve that which it could not before a jury.  That’s a huge problem. But we have an even bigger problem: you and me. The State Farms of the world will always rent-seek and will always attempt to change the rules of the game to ensure their victory. We know this. The problem is that you and I aren’t doing enough to stop our country’s seemingly inexorable slide from democracy into corporatocracy?  We’ve become jaded, resigned, disenfranchised and, according to experts, blind; blind to what’s around us and blind to the very fact of our blindness.[5] That’s the takeaway from the Invisible Gorilla experiment. We come to litigation funding. The naysayers want to frame it as a problem but it is in fact a solution born of a problem. Corporate America continues to accumulate power while you and I continue to lose ours in this zero-sum battle. Isn’t that the real problem here? Come on, don’t you see the gorilla standing right in front of you thumping his chest? Dean Lipson Covered Bridge Capital, LLC “The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge” -Stephen Hawking -- [1] www.theinvisiblegorilla.com [2] https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/AveryvStateFarmMutAutoInsCo321IllApp3d269254IllDec194746NE2d1242A/1?1552679577 [3] https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/HalevStateFarmMutAutoInsCoNo120660DRH2018BL462903SDIllDec132018Co?1552677329 [4] In the most expensive judicial election in United States history to that point, Justice Karmeier won the open seat. Ahem, he beat Appellate Judge Gordon Maag who wrote the Avery Appellate Court opinion against State Farm. [5] www.theinvisiblegorilla.com
Read More
Litigation Finance Primer

SPONSORED POST: Litigation Finance Opportunity for ‘David vs. Goliath’ Case

By John Freund |
Loewinsohn Flegle Deary Simon is prosecuting a claim valued at $31m. We are raising $2.3m for return within 12 months, possible additional upside. $450k to close, balance on run rate 30 days net to trial. The claimant is a single individual plaintiff who is a very credible former investment banker. Claimant is very knowledgeable and is committed to conclusion of the claim. One defendant is a large international financial institution and the second defendant is a highly liquid mortgage loan originator. Case documents are structured finance and real estate. Defendant’s counsel is a national general practice firm, lead defense counsel is 4-year partner. This is a complex financial claim, fact intensive, document case. Documents we hold support an opinion letter from a legal 500 firm at 80% chance of recovery. Damages are supported by preliminary economic expert and other case documents. Why we believe we will win This case arises out of a fraudulent foreclosure on plaintiffs' home. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulated plaintiff who  has brought claims that will likely result in a verdict including actual damages of $31,880,288.014 for Breach of Contract, Fraud, Fraudulent Lien Against Real Property, Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”) and Texas Debt Collection Act (“TDCA”).  Claimant was not in default, and allegations made against the plaintiff are proven to be false. The court records contain perjured statements, forged robo-signed affidavits, assignments, fraudulent liens, fraudulent appointment of substitute trustees and many other records. Defendants fraudulently concealed its lack of interest in the property by manufacturing evidence. These false allegations destroyed plaintiff’s credit, caused property loss, loss ofreputation and career. The jury will likely return a substantial verdict on the TDCA, which is a treble damages statute. It is important to note that the jury will not be advised that  fraud finding results in an automatic trebling of actual damages and mental anguish under both the DTPA and TDCA. The Court’s judgment could be set at over $69,131,398.50.   Three of the four claims allow for the recovery of attorneys’ fees. In sum, the fraudulent conduct by Defendants supports “uncapped” exemplary damages. Given the result obtained by the Loewinsohn Firm against JP Morgan Chase last year, defendants have a powerful incentive to settle this case for close to the full amount of damages. A Full litigation plan illustrates solid case of merits, liability, and damages for each claim. Plan includes analysis of defenses and key arguments. Data room is set up for due diligence. Case is on file in state court, no DCO or trial date. Preferential date will be requested within approximately 9 months. A Motion to dismiss was filed and denied. About Loewinsohn Flegle Deary Simon Loewinsohn Flegle Deary Simon have extensive experience representing clients ranging from Fortune 500 companies to individuals on both sides of the docket in complex business, employment and bankruptcy disputes. The firm’s recent successes include two high-profile cases. In July 2018, an LFDS team including Craig Simon, Alan Loewinsohn, Matt Ray and Jennifer Barall secured a $45 million settlement on behalf of Navajo Transitional Energy Company in a contract dispute against a number of public utilities.  Last year, partners Alan Loewinsohn, Jim Flegle and Kerry Schonwald represented their client Jo Hopper in a breach of trust case against J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., where a Dallas probate jury awarded $6.014 billion in damages, the largest jury verdict in the United States in 2017 and the ninth largest verdict in US history. The trial lawyers at Loewinsohn Flegle Deary Simon are nationally recognized, including most recently on Friday of last week, by editors and reporters of American Lawyer Media’s National Law Journal as the top law firm in the Nation for 2018, Elite Trial Lawyers Business Torts category. The facts and evidence to date suggest that we could achieve a similar outcome and damages to our record judgment in Hopper. We are new to litigation funding. Our view is this case is suited to Family Office, Special Situations Fund, Individual investor, joint venture with another law firm, or Hedge Fund. Xpress your interest by emailing Alan Loewinsohn AlanL@lfdslaw.com Loewinsohn Flegle Deary Simon LLP 12377 Merit Drive, Ste 900 Dallas, Texas 75251 214 572 1707 www.lfdslaw.com
Read More

Litigation Capital Management (AIM:LIT) announces settlement in principle of litigation project

By John Freund |

Litigation Capital Management Limited (AIM:LIT), a leading international provider of litigation financing solutions, announces that a settlement in principle has been reached in respect of one of its litigation projects.

Highlights

  • The project relates to an open class action LCM funded on behalf of certain former shareholders in a resources company formerly listed on the ASX
  • Expected to contribute between A$8-10 million to EBITDA for the current financial year to 30 June 2019; with all capital invested also being recovered
  • Favourable metrics for the project with the expectation of returns ahead of the last reported cumulative performance
  • The litigation project was managed to this settlement in principle in approximately 21 months
  • Fourth litigation project that LCM will complete in the current financial year
  • The settlement in principle of the class action will be documented in a Deed of Settlement that is expected to be executed shortly
The project relates to an open class action LCM funded on behalf of certain former shareholders in a resources company formerly listed on the ASX. The other party is an international professional services company and prior to a final hearing (scheduled before the Supreme Court of New South Wales), both parties participated in a mediation where the settlement in principle was reached. The settlement in principle of the class action will be documented in a Deed of Settlement that is expected to be executed shortly. The terms of the settlement are confidential, and the settlement is then subject to court approval. Class actions represent one of several types of litigation projects that LCM provides funding for across single-case and portfolio funding, as well as international arbitration, commercial claims and claims arising out of insolvency.

Patrick Moloney, CEO of LCM, said: 

"This settlement in principle demonstrates LCM’s experience in class actions in Australia, while producing favourable metrics through active project management. We have delivered a successful resolution for former shareholders in this resources company within a relatively short time period for a class action of this type.

“We remain encouraged by all the opportunities LCM is seeing as a London listed company and while class actions are part of our heritage, we have a diverse portfolio and pipeline of litigation projects including insolvency, international arbitration and corporate portfolios.”

About LCM Litigation Capital Management ("LCM") is a leading international provider of litigation financing solutions. This includes single-case and portfolio across class actions, commercial claims, claims arising out of insolvency and international arbitration. LCM has an unparalleled track record, driven by effective project selection, active project management and robust risk management. Headquartered in Sydney, with offices in London, Singapore, Brisbane and Melbourne, LCM has been listed on AIM since December 2018, trading under the ticker LIT. As at 31 December 2018, LCM's cumulative IRR calculated since 2012 (inclusive of losses) was 78%. Similarly, LCM's cumulative ROIC was 117%. Both the IRR and ROIC are exceptional figures for the industry and are testament to the consistent quality of LCM's approach to funding litigation projects and investments. The average time to completion was 27 months, as at 31 December 2018. www.lcmfinance.com
Read More

The Key Issues Facing the Litigation Funding Industry

By John Freund |
A recent Lake Whillans survey found that over 40% of litigators had first-hand experience with litigation funding. And that number is widely expected to grow over the coming year. But with mainstream acceptance comes increased attention - not all of it positive. As the funding industry expands both domestically and internationally, some key issues are rising to the forefront; ones which funders need to be proactive about addressing if they are to properly navigate this next phase of industry expansion. As reported in Above the Law, there are some challenges facing funders at the moment which desperately need to be addressed. Firstly, there is the issue of differentiation. As nine-figure fundraises become the norm, how do funders differentiate themselves and avoid industry commoditization? One way is to appeal directly to claimants by maintaining a stellar reputation when it comes to issues of capitalization, flexibility and trust. Obviously when it comes to funding, the key issue for claimants is going to be the terms they receive (another finding in the aforementioned Lake Whillans survey), but if terms do become relatively commoditized, than differentiation can happen at a more personal level. One other possibility is the establishment of novel products, such as defense-side funding. Yet it isn't entirely clear how this will solve the 'commoditization' issue, given that the moment a successful model for defense-side funding is introduced, it will likely be replicated by most funders, as was the case with portfolio funding.

Lake Whillans Releases 2019 Litigation Finance Survey

By John Freund |
Lake Whillans has released the findings from its annual litigation finance survey. The funder questioned 357 respondents ranging from solo practitioners to members of large law firms to in-house counsel, and aggregated their thoughts on the growing industry of third party funding. According to the survey, the largest proportion of respondents (36%) were law firm partners or counsel, while the remaining 64% was split mostly evenly across solo practitioners, law firm associates and in-house counsel. 41% of respondents answered in the affirmative when asked if they had first-hand experience working with a litigation finance firm. When grouped by firm size, solo practitioners had the lowest level of experience (27%), yet 2-25 person law firms had the highest rate of experience (56%). 500+ person firms came in second at 50%. In-house counsel, as can be expected, reported the lowest level of engagement at only 25%. When looking across industries, most industries sampled hovered around the 50/50 mark in terms of level of engagement. Yet the Energy industry was the only one to break the 50% mark, coming in at 53%. Finance/Banking came in at the bottom of the list, at 38%, yet that represents a 7% uptick since 2016. Interestingly, when queried on who drives the decision to utilize funding, both outside law firms and in-house counsel tend to think they are the drivers. Outside law firms named themselves as drivers 1/3 of the time, and in-house counsel only 7% of the time. Yet in-house counsel felt the opposite; that they drove the decision-making 40% of the time, and outside lawyers drove it 10%. I guess everyone likes to take credit for a good decision? The #1 motivation for seeking financing for in-house counsel is hedging the risk of litigation (43% of respondents), while the #1 motivation for law firms is lack of funds for legal fees (a full 48% gave this answer). Another top answer given was 'to help fund operating expenses.' Very few respondents cited 'lower cost of capital' as their reason for seeking funding. The majority (35%) of funders were identified through referrals, while 25% were found via the media (you're welcome!) And to no one's surprise, by far the most important consideration when choosing a litigation funder was 'Economic terms.' That was followed 'Flexibility on deal structure' and 'Funder reputation.' It is perhaps noteworthy that in-house counsel overweighted a funder's 'right to influence case strategy' as a major consideration, relative to law firm respondents. That illustrates that there is more work to be done in convincing in-house counsel that funders are not seeking to control case strategy, and remain passive investors. That said, we can all take solace in the fact that a whopping 81% of respondents said they would use litigation funding again, with only 19% saying they would not. And a full 75% said they would either strongly recommend or somewhat recommend litigation funding to others. Additionally, a full 80% of respondents predicted either rapid growth (46%) or gradual growth (34%) for the industry as a whole (count us in the 'rapid growth' category!) All told, some very positive signs for the industry, with a handful of alarm bells (that in-house counsel is overly concerned about funder control over cases is worrying). It will be interesting to see how these numbers shape up during next year's annual survey.

IMF Bentham Funds Australian Retirees’ Claim Against Australian Executor Trustees

By John Freund |
4,500 Australian investors in Australian Executor Trustees (AET) are suing the trustee for $55MM plus interest. Their suit, backed by litigation funder IMF Bentham, alleges that AET acted negligently on the sale of Southern Australian Perpetual Forests (Sapfor), which led to secured investors suddenly losing their entire investment. As reported in Investor Daily, A company called Gunns purchased Sapfor, only to experience financial difficulties which ultimately resulted in bankruptcy. Gunns took on debt from lender ANZ, which assumed control of Sapfor subsequent to Gunn's bankruptcy. In 2012, AET allegedly sold off their interest in Sapfor for $39MM, which went directly into Gunn's overdraft account. So investors saw nothing. Now investors are claiming a breach of trust, and demanding the full $55MM plus interest. Their claim was initiated in 2016 with the NSW Supreme Court. Court papers show AET is laying blame at the feet of its lawyers, Sparke Helmore, for allegedly providing negligent advice. Piper Alderman is representing claimants in the ongoing case.

Capital Pro-Égaux Inc. (NEX: CPE.H) Announces Litigation Funding Agreement

By John Freund |
MORIN-HEIGHTS, QC, March 12, 2019 /CNW Telbec/ - Capital Pro-Égaux Inc. (the "Company") (NEX: CPE.H) announces that its wholly owned subsidiary, Technique d'usinage Sinlab Inc. ("Sinlab"), has entered into a Litigation Funding Agreement for the funding of expenses related to the professional negligence action for damages commenced in 2013 in Florida against Sinlab's counsel who represented Sinlab in litigation in Virginia against certain entities who violated Sinlab's pioneering digital dentistry patent portfolio (the "Litigation"). Update on Litigation The Litigation continues and is expected to be on the trial docket for the fourth quarter, 2019, with limited additional discovery during the next few months. To date, no defendant has offered any settlement payment to Sinlab. Litigation Funding Agreement The Company and Sinlab explored solutions to finance expenses relating to the Litigation, including a temporary revocation of the cease trade order to complete a private placement of common shares and funding from commercial litigation financing entities. Ultimately, Sinlab entered into a litigation funding agreement with certain of its directors and officers upon terms and conditions consistent with those available from commercial litigation financing entities. The agreement provides for funding of litigation expenses in exchange for the payment of a portion of the proceeds from the resolution of the Litigation, including a settlement or a judgement, ranging between 20% and 40% depending on the amount of funding expended and timing of the resolution of the Litigation. In order not to hurt Sinlab's position in the Litigation, the amount of the funding is not disclosed. However, this amount is in the range of half a million dollars. Although the transaction constitutes a related party transaction of the Company within the meaning of applicable securities legislation, the Company is relying on certain exemptions from the formal valuation and minority approval requirements contained in such legislation. "The principals of the Company are committed to seeing this Litigation through and are open to considering further financing if necessary" said Mr. Pierre Désormeau, president of the Company. Caution regarding forward-looking statements This news release contains certain forward-looking statements regarding the Company's expectation of future events, including potential claims and developments regarding legal proceedings. Such expectations are based on certain assumptions based on currently available information. If these assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this press release. Factors that could lead actual results to differ include, amongst others, factors that may impact claims and legal proceedings, such as interpretation of factual matters, time and money involved in undertaking legal proceedings, uncertainty as to the final result and other risks. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by securities laws. About Pro-Égaux Inc. Pro-Égaux through its wholly owned subsidiary, Technique d'usinage Sinlab Inc., is a company based in Lachenaie, Quebec, specializing mainly in the conception and design of titanium products to be used in the dental prosthesis restoration industry. Neither NEX, the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of NEX and the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. SOURCE Capital Pro-Égaux Inc.
Read More

Legal-Bay Pre Settlement Lawsuit Funding Expects Numerous Multi-million Dollar Settlements In Defective Takata Airbag Cases

By John Freund |
MIAMIMarch 12, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Legal-Bay, The Pre Settlement Funding Company, reports today that the ongoing legal saga concerning Takata airbags isn't over yet. Plaintiffs are still filing suit against major car manufacturers including Ford, Mazda, and Toyota, citing injuries that have resulted from faulty airbags in their vehicles.
The automotive giants have come under fire in recent years for manufacturing, distributing, and/or selling certain vehicles which contained allegedly defective air bags manufactured by the Takata Corporation. The faulty devices have ruptured upon inflation, causing damage to the vehicle and/or not deployed at all, causing injury—and in some cases death—to car occupants. Four major car manufacturers concluded a class action lawsuit against Takata with over $550 million in payouts in 2017, but additional lawsuits are currently being filed.
If you are a prospective plaintiff for that has sustained injuries due to faulty airbags or other car or truck accidents, Legal-Bay can help you. Chris Janish, CEO of Legal-Bay, says, "The Takata Airbag cases have been lingering for some time. It is tragic that some of the car and truck accidents resulted in wrongful death cases, and it seems Takata is starting to take some responsibility. However, many personal injury cases requiring surgery are still moving through the court system throughout the country." Legal-Bay, one of the leading lawsuit funding companies, along with their funding partners, remains consistent in their dedication to helping clients receive cash funding for their legal needs. Their ample, knowledgeable staff is available to quickly evaluate cases for the fastest pre-settlement funding in the industry. If you are involved in a pending lawsuit and need cash advanced to you now, you may apply at: http://lawsuitssettlementfunding.com. Legal-Bay's programs are non-recourse lawsuit cash advances, also known as case funding, which means you only repay the settlement advance if you win your case. None of the programs should be considered to be a lawsuit loan, lawsuit loans, settlement loans, settlement loan, pre-settlement loans, or a pre-settlement loan. To apply now for lawsuit settlement funding go to the company's website at: http://lawsuitssettlementfunding.com or call the company's toll free intake line at: 877.571.0405 where agents are standing by. SOURCE Legal-Bay LLC
Read More

Therium launches “Therium Access” to provide not-for-profit litigation funding to improve access to justice in the UK

By John Freund |
Therium Group Holdings Limited, one of the world’s leading providers of litigation, arbitration and specialty legal finance, today announced the launch of Therium Access, which will provide not-for-profit litigation funding in order to facilitate access to justice. Therium Access is the first-of-its-kind initiative in the litigation funding industry. Grants awarded by Therium Access are intended to provide access to justice to those who lack the funds necessary to pursue or defend claims, as well as to projects that seek to improve access to justice. Therium Access is the primary expression of Therium’s corporate and social responsibility programme. Therium Access dispenses with the criteria of funding for profit and has the sole purpose of facilitating access to justice by funding cases and projects which could not usually be funded on a commercial basis.  Therium Access is a mark of Therium’s wider commitment to the pursuit of justice and the rule of law, and its launch coincides with the firm’s 10th anniversary. John Byrne, Co-Founder and CEO of Therium Capital Management Limited, said: “We are delighted to announce the launch of Therium Access, which is dedicated to improving access to justice by providing not-for -profit litigation funding for cases and projects of public interest. Therium is ten years old this year and the making of the first Therium Access grants in April will be a fantastic way to mark the firm’s 10th anniversary.” Lord Falconer, Chairman of Therium Access Advisory Committee said: “I am delighted to chair this important initiative, which is a first for the litigation funding industry and will hopefully lead the way for further initiatives.  The choking of legal support that we have witnessed in this country as a result of unprecedented cuts to legal aid has had drastic consequences on the vulnerable who are being denied access to justice, and on those individuals and organisations who work tirelessly to support them.  The not-for-profit funding that Therium Access will provide through grants for cases and projects is urgently required to make some contribution towards restoring the right to legal support, which is the bedrock of our justice system.” The first grants will be announced in April. The deadline for the submission of the next round of grant applications is 30 August 2019. Applications need to be made by legal representatives or the entity seeking a grant.  The board of Therium Access will be assisted by an Advisory Committee which will be chaired by Lord Falconer, former Lord Chancellor, Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Secretary of State for Justice. Further appointments to the advisory committee will be announced in due course. Therium Access aims to support access to justice in the broadest terms and considers applications that further the following causes (in no particular order):
  • The right to legal representation or due process;
  • The proper and efficient administration of justice;
  • The advancement of human rights;
  • The promotion of equalityof rights and diversity;
  • The protection of children, the elderly, the disabled, minorities, asylum seekers and other vulnerable or disadvantagedgroups;
  • The advancement of environmental protection or improvement;
  • The promotion of legal educationthat furthers the causes listed above; and
  • Any othercase or project in which a person, group, or entity will not have access to justice without financial assistance.
Therium Access is intended to be a global initiative, its initial focus will be on the UK and it will be rolled out in other jurisdictions in a number of planned phases. About Therium Therium is a leading global provider of litigation and arbitration and specialty legal finance, active in England and Wales since 2009. Over that period, Therium has funded claims with a total value exceeding £34 billion, including many of the largest and most high profile funded cases in the UK.  With investment teams in the UK, USA, Australia, Spain and Norway, Therium has established a track record of success in litigation finance in all forms, including single case litigation and arbitration funding, funding law firms and portfolios of litigation and arbitration claims.  Therium is also a founding member of the Association of Litigation Funders of England and Wales. Therium has consistently been at the forefront of innovation in litigation finance, pioneering the combined use of insurance tools alongside funding vehicles, and introducing portfolio funding products into the UK.  Therium’s ability to develop innovative funding arrangements and bespoke financial solutions for litigants and law firms complements its unmatched experience and rigorous approach to funding a wide range of commercial disputes throughout the world. In Chambers and Partners’ inaugural litigation support directory 2018, Therium was ranked as a Tier 1 litigation funder, and Neil Purslow, the firm’s Chief Investment Officer, was named a leading individual in the litigation funding industry. In February this year, Therium Capital Management was top ranked as one of the two “Leading” litigation and arbitration funding firms in the UK by legal and business directory Leaders League, in their 2019 ranking of litigation funding. Therium was also ranked as “Excellent” in the 2019 US ranking. www.therium.com
Read More

IMF Bentham stands behind claimants in A$75 million court action against AET (a subsidiary of IOOF)

By John Freund |
SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA: 11 MARCH 2019:  Backed by Australia's leading litigation funder, IMF Bentham Limited (ASX:IMF), thousands of Australian retirees, who lost everything after investing in a forestry scheme in the 1980s, will finally get their day in court against IOOF. The Supreme Court of NSW has scheduled the hearing over eight days from 1 July. The investors’ lawyers, Piper Alderman, allege that IOOF subsidiary, Australian Executor Trustees, failed in its duty as security trustee to protect the investors’ interests in the Southern Australian Perpetual Forests (Sapfor) scheme. Investors in Sapfor, known as “Covenantholders”, were promised a safe long term investment into land and trees in Mount Gambier’s green triangle area, but in 2012 saw their investments reduced to nil as a string of corporate blunders allowed the scheme assets to be consumed in the insolvency of Tasmanian forestry giant Gunns. It is claimed AET acted negligently and in breach of trust by prematurely releasing the scheme’s security arrangements before receiving sale proceeds worth $55m. The money was due to the Covenantholders, but never reached them – instead Gunns used it to repay its debts to bankers. Investor Anger Covenantholder Peter Hickson, from Penrith, NSW, said:
  • “I purchased my 1983 covenant in early 1984 and paid it off over several years with some effort. The plan was deliberate to have a long-term investment in what I thought was a reputable company.
  • “I trusted them and feel betrayed. They wouldn’t tell me anything.”
  • “I rang them a lot of times and got absolutely nowhere. There didn’t seem to be anybody in particular looking after the matter. It seemed to float around the office.”
  • “I’m a registered nurse and if I ever stuff up I would have to go before the registration authority. These people should face the appropriate regulating body. They should be held accountable for their actions. They should have their credentials withdrawn.
  • “Following the sale of 30 years of timber plus land valuation naturally I expected a return.”
  • Mr Hickson said he and his family faced hardships in paying off the covenant.  “I had a young family at the time and I struggled to pay it off. I was delighted when I did.  My wife got sick during the middle of it all and then, in 1990, she died.  I didn’t have the money at the time and had two young children (two boys) and had to bring them up.”
  • “I didn’t do anything wrong but lost the lot because they pinched it,” Mr Hickson said.
Another Covenantholder said
  • We were a young couple with three small children and only one wage when we believed the SAPFORagent and his promise of benefits from growing trees which we love…my prayer is that there is justice for the many cheated of their rights”
The Legal Case The Covenantholders are represented by leading law firm, Piper Alderman. Partner Simon Morris said:
  • “This is a remarkably simple case. The bundle of rights that protected Covenantholders’ investment included Covenantholders holding security over the scheme assets.  That security was to remain in place until Covenantholders received the proceeds from the sale of their assets. The negligence is that upon the sale of the scheme assets the security trustee, AET, as advised by Sparke Helmore lawyers, inexplicably consented to the security being released without the Covenantholders also receiving the proceeds from the sale of their assets. The result was the Covenantholders went from being secured for the full value of their investment to losing everything. These Covenantholders have been badly let down by the professionals whose job it was to look after their commercial interests. Fortunately our legal system allows third-party funding so these wronged individuals can afford to ‘have their day in court and achieve some redress’”. 
Providing Access to Justice Oliver Gayner of IMF Bentham said: “Many Covenantholders lost their retirement funds when this scheme went under, but when they tried to enquire what had happened they were met with a ‘wall of silence’. IMF is proud to be standing behind the Covenantholders and Trustee David Kerr at RSM Partners. We hope with our support they will finally see the justice they deserve.” Background  The Sapfor scheme, established in 1926, was marketed to Australian investors as “truly a unique opportunity… your investment is little affected by industrial disputes or temporary economic downturns”.  Subscribing for a Covenant bought an interest in the scheme trees and land, and a right to the proceeds when the trees were felled, milled and sold as timber.  Back in 1964, Australian Executor Trustees (SA) Ltd in Adelaide had been appointed to protect the Covenantholders’ interests by acting as the scheme’s security trustee.  AET registered security instruments known as “encumbrances” which, similar to a mortgage, prevented the land from being sold until the Covenantholders were paid their due proceeds. The genesis of the trouble can be traced to 2008, when Gunns, the Tasmanian forestry group run by controversial businessman John Gay, bought Sapfor and its parent company Auspine in a deal valued at nearly $350 million.  The deal would prove costly as the bottom fell out of the woodchip market following the GFC, and Gunns struggled to pay off its debts. In 2010, two years after acquiring Auspine, Gunns granted fixed and floating charge security over all the Sapfor scheme assets to its lender ANZ Bank as a condition for a new loan of $340m. AET was unaware at the time this had occurred, despite the charge being entered on ASIC’s public register.  As Gunn's cash troubles grew it sought to sell off assets to pay the ANZ back.  A buyer from overseas was found for Sapfor, and in March 2012 – by which time Gunns’ shares had been suspended from trading - a deal was signed with Gunns agreeing to sell the trees and land for $39m and AET agreeing to release its encumbrances with immediate effect.  AET consented for the money to be paid directly to Gunns’ overdraft account, and when only a few months later Gunns went bust the entirety of the scheme’s assets, totalling around $55m, were lost to receivers appointed by ANZ Bank. The Covenantholders say that AET’s duty was to keep this security in place until the Covenantholders were paid their entitlements in full. “Would your bank release its mortgage over your property until you’d paid them back every last cent?  Of course, they wouldn’t.  It’s really that simple.  The trustee had one job to do, and they stuffed it up”, said Mr Hickson. Legal Proceedings The current court stoush began in 2016 when an aggrieved Covenantholder, with backing from IMF Bentham, applied to the NSW Supreme Court to appoint a new trustee to investigate Sapfor’s affairs. In July 2016, David Kerr of RSM Partners in Sydney was appointed additional trustee and a year later, with approval from the Court, Mr Kerr commenced proceedings on behalf of the Covenantholders - believed to number around 4500 in total - to recover the $55m losses plus interest from AET. Court papers show AET sought to defend the case by blaming its then lawyers, Sparke Helmore, for giving allegedly negligent advice.  Meanwhile parent company IOOF has been fighting its own problems, including the Hayne Royal Commission and the Provident Capital class action which it agreed to settle for a reported $44.25m. For Mr Hickson and his fellow Covenantholders, many of whom are elderly retirees, the court hearing can’t come soon enough. “We have waited since 1983 for these trees to come and now we have nothing, we are gutted down here”, said one. Others reported their frustration at the “wall of silence” as repeated enquiries to AET and IOOF led to nothing. “It would be wonderful if those responsible are penalised and held to account”. Who is who Sapfor - Southern Australia Perpetual Forests Ltd (ACN 007 872 120) Was set up in 1926 for commercial timber production. For generations, it was marketed as a secure and tax efficient long-term investment suitable for retail investors, who could share in proceeds of timber growing in the green triangle area around Mount Gambier in South Australia and Victoria.  Sapfor later became part of the Auspine forestry group, and then part of Gunns following Gunns’ acquisition of Auspine in 2008. Australian Executor Trustees (SA) Ltd (AET) An Adelaide based subsidiary of the Australian Executor Trustees group, itself part of IOOF. AET’s role was to act as the scheme’s security trustee on behalf of the Convenantholders, overseeing Sapfor’s operation of the scheme, registering security (in the form of encumbrances over land), and ensuring that Covenantholders received their proceeds due from the sale of scheme land and timber. Covenantholders  The mainly retail investors who invested in the scheme via subscriptions for “Covenants”. Gunns  Tasmanian forestry group run by John Gay. Gunns bought Auspine in 2008, and in 2010 granted its principal creditor, ANZ Bank, a charge over the entirety of the Auspine scheme assets as collateral for further borrowing. Became insolvent in September 2012. Piper Alderman A commercial law firm with offices in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Adelaide. It has more than 60 partners and more than 300 staff.  Piper Alderman (partner Simon Morris) act for Mr David Kerr, the additional trustee of the scheme who is bringing the claim on behalf of the Covenantholders, and are instructing Alan Sullivan QC, David Sulan and Sebastian Hartford Davis of the Sydney bar. IMF Bentham (ASX: IMF) Litigation funder backing Mr Kerr and working with Piper Alderman (Investment Manager: Oliver Gayner). Timeline 1926  The Sapfor scheme is established. For generations, it was marketed as a secure and tax efficient long-term investment suitable for retail investors, who could share in proceeds of timber growing the green triangle area around Mount Gambier in South Australia and Victoria. The scheme was operated by two SEAS Sapfor companies, which were part of the Auspine group. 1964 AET appointed as security trustee by a Deed of Trust.  AET’s core duty was to ensure that Covenantholders received their proceeds due from the sale of scheme land and timber. One of the features that helped the stability of the investment was that AET held security instruments called encumbrances (similar in effect to a mortgage) over the scheme land securing Sapfor’s obligation to pay proceeds of timber sales to Covenantholders. Additionally, Sapfor was prohibited from charging scheme timber and land without AET’s consent. January 2008  Auspine is bought by the Gunns Group in a deal reportedly valued at $348m (cash of $279 million with the balance paid in Gunns shares). February 2010 In breach of the prohibition against charging scheme assets, and unbeknown to AET and the Covenantholders, Gunns granted its principal creditor, ANZ Bank, a charge over the entirety of the Sapfor scheme assets as collateral for $340m further borrowing.  The charge was registered with ASIC but its existence was initially not detected by AET. June 2011 Gunns’ Annual Report shows loss of $355.5m. February – March 2012 Gunns’ shares are twice suspended from trading on the ASX. March 2012 In an attempt to repay its massive debts, Gunns sold the scheme trees and land to a third party investor for $39m. As part of the sale of the scheme assets, AET consented to the encumbrances in favour of Covenantholders being discharged, but received nothing in return as the proceeds were paid directly into Gunns’ overdraft account. The consequence was that none of the purchase price for the scheme timber, and other scheme assets totalling around $55m, ever reached the Covenantholders. Instead, the proceeds became subject to the ANZ charge. September 2012 Gunns is insolvent and receivers and administrators are appointed to take over the company. Having had their security forfeited by AET the Covenantholders were rendered unsecured creditors in the Gunns’ liquidation. The result was that 4500 to 5000 Covenantholders lost their whole investment.  With Sapfor insolvent and AET not answering questions, Covenantholders faced a “wall of silence” when trying to understand where their savings had gone. March 2015 High Court rejects AET’s attempts to argue that the receivers did not, in fact, have priority: Korda v Australian Executor Trustees (SA) Ltd [2015] HCA 6. Mid 2015 Simon Morris of Piper Alderman takes up the case after being contacted by an aggrieved Covenantholder, Mr John Armour. June 2016 A new trustee is appointed after Piper Alderman applied to the NSW Supreme Court on Mr Armour’s behalf. The new trustee is Mr David Kerr of RSM.  Mr Kerr is granted access to the books and records of the trust and conducts investigations. June 2017 Mr Kerr receives judicial approval from the NSW Supreme Court (equity division) to commence proceedings against AET for negligence and breach of trust seeking to recover the Covenantholder losses, by now totalling around $75m including interest. November 2017 AET files its defence denying liability and cross-claiming against its then solicitors, Sparke Helmore. for the losses.  Sparke Helmore also refuses to accept liability. February 2019 A date is set down for the case to be heard in the NSW Supreme Court: 1 July 2019 (8 days). ABOUT IMF BENTHAM LIMITED IMF has a highly experienced litigation funding team overseeing its investments. We have a 90% success rate over 184 completed investments and have recovered over AU$1.4 billion for clients since 2001. IMF is one of the leading global litigation funders, headquartered in Australia and with offices in the US, Canada, Singapore, Hong Kong and London. IMF has built its reputation as a trusted provider of innovative litigation funding solutions and has established an increasingly diverse portfolio of litigation funding assets at 31 December 2018, IMF has 80 active investments around the world. For further information  regarding IMF and its activities, please visit www.imf.com.au ABOUT RSM  RSM Partners is one of Australia’s leading professional services firms, with advisers in 30 offices across Australia providing expert corporate financial and advisory accounting services. RSM is a member of the world’s sixth largest audit, tax and consulting network. This global nexus of member firms draws on more than 43,000 people in 800 offices, across 120 countries - including the world’s top 40 major business centres - to help guide clients through business challenges, both locally and seamlessly across borders. RSM member firms offer a wide range of specialist international services, such as wealth management, IT, consulting, legal and risk advisory, forensic accounting, human resource consulting, and global compliance reporting. David Kerr is a Partner of the Restructuring & Recovery division and has over 25 years' experience. He provides advice on and accepts appointments to both corporate and personal insolvency matters. For further information please visit www.rsm.global/australia/ ABOUT PIPER ALDERMAN Piper Alderman is a leading, national law firm, providing commercial legal services across Australia for over 160 years. We have achieved our impressive growth by listening to our clients, responding to their needs and creating practical legal solutions. Piper Alderman Partner, Simon Morris, is leading the claim against AET and Sparke Helmore. Simon is a pre-eminent commercial litigation lawyer. He practises predominantly in complex disputes in the Federal and Supreme Courts and has a particular focus in securities class actions. He is the Head of Piper Alderman’s Sydney office and was formerly the national practice head of Piper Alderman’s commercial litigation division. For further information please visit www.piperalderman.com.au
Read More

LCM TO COMMIT CAPITAL OF A$100 MILLION IN AUSTRALASIA DURING 2019

By John Freund |
SYDNEY, 11 March 2019: Litigation Capital Management (“LCM” or “the Company”), a leading international provider of litigation financing solutions, announces its intention to commit A$100 million of capital into Australasian litigation finance projects during 2019. The capital commitment will be invested across all types of litigation finance projects that LCM typically funds, although the Company expects a significant proportion to be allocated to funding corporate portfolio projects across the region. There is a significant growth opportunity for LCM to finance corporate portfolio projects, where funding and risk management solutions are provided directly to corporate entities across a number of cases. This is a market that is still new and largely under-developed in the region and is therefore viewed as key area for LCM’s future growth. LCM’s team includes a number of pioneers in this space, who have significant experience of originating and structuring such transactions, which allow a company to remove the financial risk of undertaking litigation and the detrimental accounting effects that accompany it. Patrick Moloney, CEO of LCM, said: “The success of our listing on the AIM component of the London Stock Exchange means that we are able to commit capital on a larger scale to high-quality litigation finance projects. Our heritage is in Australasia, a market we have operated in for over 20 years, and we are pleased to announce a commitment of A$100 million in capital to this key region for LCM. Whilst we see strong growth potential across all types of projects that we finance, we are particularly excited about the opportunities in the corporate portfolio space. “Our team includes some of the most experienced practitioners globally in developing corporate portfolio transactions, which are nuanced and complex, with different value drivers and success factors to single-case litigation finance projects. However, they make complete sense for the client and elevate the funders position to one of being a true corporate finance provider.” About Litigation Capital Management (LCM) Litigation Capital Management ("LCM") is a leading international provider of litigation financing solutions. This includes single-case and portfolio; across class actions, commercial claims, claims arising out of insolvency and international arbitration. LCM has an unparalleled track record, driven by effective project selection, active project management and robust risk management. Headquartered in Sydney, with offices in London, Singapore, Brisbane and Melbourne, LCM has been listed on AIM (part of the London Stock Exchange) since December 2018, trading under the ticker LIT. www.lcmfinance.com    
Read More

Financial Poise™ Announces “Commercial Litigation Funding,” a New Webinar Series Premiering March 13th at 3:00 PM CST through West LegalEdcenter™

By John Freund |
The first episode in this series is titled "An Introduction to a New Yet Old Funding Alternative " and is co-produced by West LegalEdCenter™. It will feature Jeremy Waitzman (Sugar Felsenthal Grais & Helsinger LLP); David Spiegel (GLS Capital, LLC); Ken Epstein (Bentham IMF); and Evan Fried (Greybridge Capital LLC). CHICAGO (PRWEB) March 06, 2019 About the Series: This three-part series is geared towards educating attorneys and clients on legal/ethical, strategic, and business decisions when considering litigation funding, and investors seeking to learn about an increasingly mainstream asset class. About the Episode: Litigation funding is an increasingly-popular tool for attorneys and clients to share the risk and reward of litigation with third-party investors, and for investors to capitalize on the uncorrelated returns generated by legal-driven revenue. This webinar is intended to provide an overview of the topic generally, touching on the "who," "what," "where," "when," "why" and "how's" behind litigation funding. To learn more, click here. The webinar will be available on-demand after its premiere. As with every Financial Poise Webinar, it will be an engaging and plain English conversation designed to entertain as it teaches. About Financial Poise  Financial Poise has one mission: to provide reliable plain English business, financial and legal education to investors, private business owners and executives, and their respective trusted advisors. Financial Poise content is created by seasoned, respected experts who are invited to join our Faculty only after being recommended by current Faculty Members. Our editorial staff then works to make sure all content is easily digestible. Financial Poise is a meritocracy; nobody can "buy" their way into the Financial Poise Faculty. Start learning today at https://www.financialpoise.com/
Read More

Legal-Bay Lawsuit Funding Reports Recent Medical Malpractice Caps Ruled Unconstitutional In Florida

By John Freund |
TALLAHASSEE, Fla.March 7, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Legal-Bay, the premier Pre Settlement Funding Company, announced today that they are preparing for huge growth in their medical malpractice department.
An economic reward in a medical malpractice lawsuit provides financial compensation to injured patients. Non-economic awards can offer compensation above and beyond any medical costs, including any pain and suffering the patient may be dealing with. Usually, payout caps are put in place to minimize such cash settlements. North Dakota, for example, places a strict limit on any non-economic payouts, meaning that regardless of an individual's circumstances, the most they could hope to receive in damages would be $500,000California's non-economic damages are capped at $250,000. There are many other states with similar medical malpractice caps.
However, payout caps have recently come under fire as being outdated and unconstitutional. In 2015, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that damage caps are in violation of the law under their state Constitution. While the decision only applied to Florida's specific laws, other states are utilizing the ruling to reconsider their own caps. Legal-Bay expects that with higher damages, there will be a spike in lawsuit cash advance funding for medical malpractice cases, whether against a hospital, surgery center, doctor or surgeon. Chris Janish, CEO, commented, "The Florida ruling was long overdue since most of these caps were enacted many years ago and don't even reflect fair value in today's economy. However, the issues go deeper in regard to constitutionality and protecting victims. We are hopeful that other states will take notice and enable victims to sue for fair value of their injuries." Legal-Bay's non-recourse pre-settlement funding programs are not a lawsuit funding loan, lawsuit loans, presettlement loan, presettlement loans, pre-settlement loan, or pre-settlement loans as many clients may think. Pre-settlement funding is merely an immediate cash allowance given in advance of a plaintiff's impending monetary award. The cash advance is risk-free, as the money does not need to be repaid should the recipient lose their case. To apply right now, please go to the company's website at: http://lawsuitssettlementfunding.com or call the company toll-free at: 877.571.0405 where agents are standing by. SOURCE Legal-Bay LLC

Related Links

http://lawsuitssettlementfunding.com
Read More

Litigation Support Leaders LexShares and GLG Law to Partner, Will Cross-Promote Services to Clients

By John Freund |
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--LexShares, a leader in commercial litigation finance, and GLG Law, a leader in expert witness services, today announced an exclusive new partnership under which they will offer their litigation support products to one another’s clients. Together, LexShares and GLG Law have worked with more than three quarters of the AmLaw 100 and are trusted partners of hundreds of law firms globally.
The agreement brings together two firms in adjacent segments of the legal field with the goal of creating a more integrated experience for attorneys and their clients. GLG Law clients will receive access to LexShares’ litigation funding services. Similarly, LexShares’ clients will have access to GLG Law’s industry-leading expert witness services. The newly forged relationship creates an innovative offering in the legal industry and aims to add value to clients of both LexShares and GLG Law. “Aligning with the premier expert witness service in the legal industry was a compelling opportunity for us. We’re confident that direct access to highly qualified experts will provide a substantial benefit to our clients,” said Jay Greenberg, Chief Executive Officer at LexShares. “Where capital is the fuel often necessary to litigate effectively, engaging with the right litigation support partners is equally critical for a successful resolution.” “GLG Law connects our clients with the most qualified, experienced, and reliable expert witnesses – a critical component of winning a case,” said David Solomon, General Manager of GLG Law. “We’re excited that we now have a strategic relationship with a leading litigation funder. We anticipate LexShares will add immediate value to our clients interested in pursuing financing options.” About LexShares LexShares is a leading litigation finance firm, with an innovative approach to originating and financing high-value commercial legal claims. LexShares funds litigation-related matters through both its online marketplace and dedicated litigation finance fund. Founded in 2014, the company is privately owned with principal offices in Boston and New York City. For more information, visit lexshares.com. About GLG Law GLG Law is a division of GLG (Gerson Lehrman Group), the platform that connects professionals to insight. GLG Law serves leading law firms and corporations around the world, including 8 of the top 10 American law firms, delivering expert witness and consultant recommendations and solutions by leveraging GLG’s membership of more than 650,000 experts around the world. Visit glg.it/law.

Contacts

LexShares Matt Burke, +1 603-315-0618 mattdavidburke@gmail.com
Read More

Canadian innovator JL Energy Transportation Inc. obtains funding from leading litigation funder Bentham IMF Capital Limited for infringement action against major Canada/US pipeline and gas processing companies

By John Freund |
CALGARYMarch 6, 2019 /CNW/ - JL Energy Transportation Inc. ("JETI", more: www.jlenergy.com) announces that it has obtained third-party funding from Bentham IMF Capital Limited ("Bentham"), the Canadian arm of leading global litigation funder IMF Bentham (ASX:IMF), for license and patent infringement claims against an alliance of major Canadian and US pipeline and gas processing companies.
The defendant companies currently include: Alliance Pipeline Limited Partnership, Alliance Pipeline Ltd., Alliance Pipeline L.P., Alliance Pipeline Inc., (collectively, "Alliance"), Aux Sable Liquid Products LP (formerly known as Alliance Pipeline NGL, LP) and Aux Sable Liquid Products Inc. (formerly known as Alliance Pipeline NGL Inc.)(together, "Aux Sable"). JETI is claiming significant damages as a result of Alliance and Aux Sable's alleged infringements of JETI's licenses and intellectual property rights.
Background In the early 1990s a team led by John Lagadin, the founder of JETI, invented a novel and innovative method for more efficiently and cost-effectively transporting enriched natural gas via a single pipeline carrying both natural gas and natural gas liquids ("NGLs") from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin to the lucrative US mid-western natural gas and NGL market (more). It was a ground-breaking invention that caught the eye of 22 producers, including some of North America'slargest energy companies. These companies subsequently formed the "Alliance Pipeline" which went into service December 1, 2000. JETI licensed the technology (subsequently patented in a number of jurisdictions around the world) to the Alliance and Aux Sable companies, who between 1996 and 2000 planned and constructed a 3,848 km pipeline from BC and Alberta to Chicago as part of an integrated energy system to export Western Canadian enriched natural gas to be processed at the US market hub in a world class processing facility. The Alliance Pipeline was one of the most significant infrastructure projects in North America at the time. It has since delivered an average of 1.6 billion cubic feet of enriched gas every day to the Chicago market (more than 1/5th of Canada's natural gas exports). This major success story of Canadian innovation, built on the entrepreneurialism of the JETI team, has provided Canada access to a valuable export market and contributed billions of dollars to Canada's GDP and Alberta's royalty revenues. What has happened JETI alleges that Alliance and Aux Sable have in recent years used its proprietary and patented technology to transport and process rich natural gas on additional pipelines in British Columbia, Alberta and North Dakota without license or authorization. What is being done Bentham has agreed to fund JETI's action against Alliance and Aux Sable filed under Alberta Court of Queen's Bench Court File No. 1601-06322, as well as JETI's defence of Aux Sable's subsequent challenge of one of JETI's patents (Federal Court File No. T-1612-16). Aux Sable's Federal Court challenge is scheduled to commence on March 11, 2019 in Calgary, Alberta. JETI is represented by MLT Aikins LLP. Bentham's funding of JETI helps level the financial playing field for a private company taking on significantly larger entities with greater resources. John Lagadin, President of JETI, said: "We are very pleased to have Bentham on board to fund our court actions as their significant due diligence, capital at risk, and proven track record, clearly validates our confidence in our long standing claims against Alliance et al. This funding allows us to continue our already lengthy quest for justice, and we look forward to a successful outcome once the courts have been presented with the facts in the case." About the Defendants The Alliance Pipeline system consists of an approximately 3,848-kilometer (2,391-mile) integrated Canadian and US natural gas transmission pipeline system, delivering rich natural gas from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin and the Williston Basin to the Chicago market hub. The Alliance system delivers, on average, about 45.3 million standard cubic metres (or 1.6 billion standard cubic feet) of natural gas per day. More: www.alliancepipeline.com. Alliance Pipeline Limited Partnership (Alliance Canada) owns the Canadian portion of the Alliance Pipeline system. Alliance Pipeline L.P. (Alliance U.S.A.) owns the U.S. portion of the Alliance Pipeline system. Alliance is represented by Rose LLP. Aux Sable commenced operation as part of the Alliance Pipeline and Aux Sable dense phase gas system. At that time, two companies were established, one in the United States, and one in Canada, to manage the natural gas liquids business associated with the Alliance Pipeline. In 2010, a second U.S. company, Aux Sable Midstream (ASM) was established to focus on other midstream developments in the United StatesAux Sable owns and operates a world-scale natural gas liquids extraction and fractionation facility in Illinois near the terminus of the Alliance Pipeline. The facility is currently capable of processing 2.1 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas and can produce approximately 107,000 barrels per day of specification natural gas liquid products. Aux Sable's rich gas premiums provide market access to rich gas producers in Canada and the U.S. that cannot be realized through conventional field extraction and local NGL sales. Aux Sable is represented by McCarthy Tetrault LLP. About Bentham IMF Bentham IMF Capital Limited is the Canadian arm of IMF Bentham Limited (ASX: IMF), one of the leading global litigation & dispute financiers, headquartered in Australia and with offices in Canada, the US, SingaporeHong Kong and London. IMF has built its reputation as a trusted provider of innovative litigation funding solutions and has established an increasingly diverse portfolio of litigation & dispute financing assets. IMF has been a leading pioneer of litigation financing in Australia since 2001, playing a significant role in the initial steps towards a globalized industry via its international expansion in Canada, the US, Asia and Europe. IMF has a highly experienced litigation funding team overseeing its investments delivering a 90% success rate across 179 completed cases (at 30 September 2018). More: www.benthamimf.ca. SOURCE JL Energy Transportation Inc. View original content: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/March2019/06/c4638.html
Read More

Litigation Capital Management (AIM:LIT): Appointment of Jonathan Moulds as Chairman

By John Freund |

Litigation Capital Management Limited (AIM:LIT) (LCM), a leading international provider of litigation financing solutions, today announces that it has appointed Jonathan Moulds as Non-Executive Chairman effective 29 March 2019.

This follows Jonathan’s appointment to the Board as Non-Executive Director of LCM in December 2018, when the Company listed on AIM. Jonathan takes over the role of Chairman from David King, who will remain on the Board as a Non-Executive Director.

Jonathan brings extensive experience in the financial services industry. He was previously the Chief Operating Officer of Barclays PLC. Prior to his role at Barclays, he was head of Bank of America’s European business until 2013 and became the Chief Executive Officer of Merrill Lynch International following the merger of the two institutions in 2008.

Patrick Moloney, Chief Executive Officer of LCM, said:

As we expand LCM’s international focus, we’re thrilled to have further strengthened our team with the appointment Jonathan as Chairman. This announcement follows a series of exciting and significant operational developments at LCM including several new board and management team hires, and our expansion into London and Singapore as key growth markets. Together with the rest of the Board, I am looking forward to working with Jonathan and the wider team to realise the clear growth opportunity that LCM offers.

“I would also like to thank David for his support as Chairman over recent years. We will continue to benefit from his expertise on the Board.”

Jonathan Moulds, Chairman of LCM, said:

“I’m delighted to take on the role of Chairman at LCM. It’s a privilege to be involved with one of the litigation finance industry’s most established and exciting players at this pivotal time in its development.

“This is an interesting time for the litigation funding sector globally as it enters a period of rapid expansion and LCM is well-positioned to take advantage of this given its significant international presence, its team’s outstanding track record and the quality and depth of its pipeline of future litigation projects.”

Litigation Capital Management

Patrick Moloney, Chief Executive Officer

Nick Rowles-Davies, Executive Director

Hawthorn Advisors                                             lcm@hawthornadvisors.com

Lorna Cobbett / Zinka MacHale                          Tel: 020 3745 4960

About Jonathan Moulds

Jonathan has held a number of senior leadership roles at major financial institutions, most recently at Barclays plc, where he was the Group Chief Operating Officer until 2016. He was previously the head of Bank of America's International business and became the Chief Executive Officer of Merrill Lynch International following the merger of the two institutions in 2008. Jonathan has a strong financial markets background and was responsible for Bank of America International’s Global Markets business prior to the merger. He has worked in most major financial centres, including the U.S., the U.K. and Asia during his career.

Jonathan has served widely on key industry associations including as chairman of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) from 2004 until 2008 and as a director of the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME). He remains a member of AFME's Advisory Board. Jonathan was a member of the Capital Markets Senior Practitioners of the UK Financial Services Authority and the Global Financial Markets Association.

Jonathan is currently a Non-Executive Board member for IG Group Holdings PLC and is a member of the Board Risk Committee and Remuneration Committee.

About LCM

Litigation Capital Management (“LCM”) is a leading international provider of litigation financing solutions. This includes single-case and portfolios across class actions, commercial claims, claims arising out of insolvency and international arbitration. LCM has an unparalleled track record, driven by effective project selection, active project management and robust risk management. Headquartered in Sydney, with offices in London, Singapore, Brisbane and Melbourne, LCM has been listed on AIM since December 2018, trading under the ticker LIT. www.lcmfinance.com

Read More

Native American Venture Fund (NAVF) to Speak at the 4th Litigation Funding Conference in Florida on March 8, 2019

By John Freund |
Ticonderoga Ventures, Inc. announces that Native American Venture Fund (NAVF) will speak at the Litigation Funding Conference ( https://litigationfundingconference.com ) on March 8, 2019, in Delray Beach, FL. John Cataldi directs the investment and fund strategies of the Native American Venture Fund Family (NAVF) as its co-managing partner. He will speak on best practices of venture finance, investment, syndication and strategies to unlock new capital pools of investment. Moreover, Cataldi will discuss his personal experiences in managing portfolio returns and investor expectations.  Lastly, he will announce NAVF’s Opioid Litigation Fund, which will focus on pharmaceutical company oversupply while seeking economic and injunctive relief to prevent future abuses to North American Indigenous Communities. Video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFDr_9-abVY ABOUT NATIVE AMERICAN VENTURE FUND NAVF is series of impact investment funds that promote Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) development activities for indigenous tribes throughout North America. Under Cataldi’s leadership, the fund leverages contracting preferences, tax incentives and other distinct competitive advantages legislatively granted to federally recognized tribes. NAVF’s portfolio focuses across multiple industries to include Carbon Sequestration, Pharmaceutical importation/distribution, FinTech, E-Commerce, and Government Contracting. For more information visit:  http://www.NAVF.net . ABOUT THE LITIGATION FUNDING CONFERENCE The Litigation Funding Conference is the leading networking and business event for the industry.  Corporate counsel and attorneys from significantly sized law firms seeking finances for high-value claims meet directly with third-party litigation funding firms, venture capitalists and hedge funds.  Financial professionals and investors representing significant resources attend to fund suits they are expressly interested in. Time, the most valuable commodity at the event, is designed for maximum efficiency in introducing attorneys with those that provide funding to identify the best opportunities and begin the deal-making process quickly. Registration for the event can be made at https://litigationfundingconference.com/register-miami-2019.php For more information, please visit the website https://www.litigationfundingconference.com or contact: Ticonderoga Ventures, Inc. Marketing and Logistics Representative Tel/ Fax: USA +1 (212) 722-1744 E-mail:  info-21@litigationfundingconference.com Twitter:  @LITIGATIONFUND1 This press release may contain forward-looking statements, particularly as related to the business plans of the company, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are subject to the safe harbor created by these sections. Actual results may differ materially from the company’s expectations and estimates.
Read More

Gowling WLG Partner James Foster to Join Augusta Ventures

By John Freund |
Augusta, the largest litigation and dispute funding institution in the UK – with £150m of capital and a team of 70 in London – today announces the appointment of James Foster as Head of Commercial and Bilateral Investment Treaties Arbitration. He will be based in Augusta’s London office from April 2019. James joins from international law firm Gowling WLG (formerly Wragge Lawrence Graham) where he heads the Middle East Arbitration and Construction Disputes practice, having started the Lawrence Graham office in Dubai in 2007. James has consistently been ranked by the Chambers Global Directory as one of the UAE’s leading construction disputes lawyers and is Vice-Chairman of the Society of Construction Law (Gulf). He has taken a keen interest in the development of funding solutions for international arbitration both in the Middle East and more widely and he is the lead author of the UAE chapter in the Guide to Litigation Funding, a global survey of the law and practice of third-party funding. Before moving to Dubai James also spent over 10 years focusing on dispute resolution in the South East Asia region. Commenting on the appointment, Louis Young, Managing Director at Augusta said: “We’re delighted to welcome James to Augusta. With his wide experience of high value international arbitration claims, James will play a key role in developing our involvement in this important and growing sector”. James Foster commented: “I am very pleased to be part of the continued expansion of Augusta’s operations given the exciting opportunities for further development of the arbitration funding market both in the UK and internationally. I am very much looking forward to working with Augusta’s capable team in this area and to helping develop a market leading practice”. About Augusta Ventures
  • Established in 2013, Augusta is the largest litigation and dispute funding institution in the UK – with £150m of capital and a team of 70 in London and 85 worldwide. Augusta’s scale enables us to make decisions in market-leading timeframes and fund cases of any size.
  • Augusta is organised into a series of specialist practice groups: Arbitration, Class Action, Competition, Consumer, Intellectual Property and Litigation, and sectors including Financial Services and Construction & Energy.
  • By the end of 2018, Augusta had funded 197 claims with a market leading win ratio of 80%.
Read More